Retrospective guide

The 4Ls retrospective: Liked, Learned, Lacked, Longed For

A format that separates what happened from what the team learned and what it wishes it had. Here is what each column means, how to run one, and examples you can steal.

Run a 4Ls retro

What is the 4Ls retrospective?

The 4Ls is a retrospective format with four columns, each a prompt about the last sprint. Where Start, Stop, Continue pushes straight to actions, the 4Ls first makes room for reflection, which is why it works so well after a sprint with a lot going on.

Liked

What went well and felt good. Wins, smooth handovers, a tool that paid off. The things worth doing again on purpose.

Learned

What the team knows now that it did not at the start of the sprint. Technical discoveries, process lessons, facts about the users or the system.

Lacked

What was missing that the team needed during this sprint. Information, access, time, a decision, a person.

Longed For

What the team wishes it had, even if it is bigger than one sprint. This is where ambitions and structural asks surface.

The split between Lacked and Longed For is the format's best trick: it lets a team say "we needed a staging environment this sprint" and "we wish we had a dedicated tester" without the two getting muddled into one complaint.

How to run one (about 45 minutes)

  1. Set the frame (2 min). Name the sprint or the piece of work being reviewed. The 4Ls drifts if the scope is vague.
  2. Collect (10 min). Everyone adds notes to all four columns silently. Ask for at least one note in Learned; it is the column people skip and the one with the most durable value.
  3. Group (5 min). Cluster near-duplicates so themes stand out.
  4. Vote (5 min). A few votes each, across all columns. Let the team decide what deserves discussion.
  5. Discuss and act (20 min). Work through the top-voted items. Lacked items usually become action items for next sprint; Longed For items become conversations with whoever can grant them; Learned items get written down somewhere the next person can find them.

4Ls examples for software teams

Liked

Learned

Lacked

Longed for

Facilitation tips

Questions teams ask

What does 4Ls stand for?

Liked, Learned, Lacked and Longed For. What went well, what the team now knows, what was missing, and what the team wishes it had.

When should we use it instead of Start, Stop, Continue?

When there is a lot to digest: a big release, a migration, an incident, or the first sprint on something new. Use Start, Stop, Continue when you mostly want decisions.

How long does it take?

About 45 minutes for six to eight people. It runs longer than a three-column format because of the discussion the Learned column generates; that is the point.

What is the difference between Lacked and Longed For?

Lacked is specific to this sprint and usually fixable next sprint. Longed For is aspirational and often needs someone outside the team to grant it.

More retrospective formats

See all five templates with guidance on choosing between them: Sprint retrospective templates. Related formats: Start, Stop, Continue, Mad, Sad, Glad, Sailboat, Rose, Bud, Thorn.

Run a 4Ls retrospective now

Create a board with the four columns, share the link, collect anonymously, vote, assign actions. No account required for the team.

Start the retro